|
|
|
**76-46, 62% Game of the Month Run!**
Scott's NBA **SLAM DUNK GAME OF THE MONTH!**
|
| **GAME OF THE MONTH - ALERT!** Scott Spreitzer has slammed the books to the tune of 76-46, 62% winners with his last 122 GOMs (all sports)! His next goes on Tuesday. Grab Scott's coveted NBA **SLAM DUNK GAME OF THE MONTH** as he also looks to extend his May NBA run to 70% winners! |
If You Lose $ 0 When You WIN $ 35  |
|
|
Scott Spreitzer began his handicapping career at the age of 21 as the host/capper for Sunrise Sports. The first daily radio program dedicated solely to handicapping information was heard from Honolulu to Tampa Bay. Scott is now in his 14th year of handicapping and can currently be seen nationally on Proline, aired on football weekends on the USA cable network. Scott really got his jump in the business as co-host of the Stardust Line from 1992-1997. He was the weekly football analyst on the Pete Rose show in 1997. Scott hosted the ESportsDaily radio show heard in over 60 U.S. cities from 1998-2000. Scott is the only handicapper to advance to 3 straight finals of the Station Casinos Invitational, with 3 straight second place finishes. In fact, Scott has released over 500 plays in 5 seasons in the Invitational hitting 59% ATS, documented by the Sunset Station and the Las Vegas public!
Scott is currently the featured handicapper for numerous radio broadcasts around the country and is one of the few handicappers that has been able to cross the fine line between handicapper and radio interviewer. Scott has interviewed such notables as Joe Frazier, Dennis Green, John Robinson, Duce Staley, and Ahman Green, to name a few.
Scott Spreitzer can be seen weekly throughout the football season on Proline on the USA Cable Network.
|
|
|
|
|
Time 2008-05-12 20:05:00 |
|
|
I pick "
(909) STL Cardinals
".
I'm laying the short price with the Cards on Monday. Adam Wainwright has a huge edge on the mound over Dave Bush. Wainwright is the ace of the St. Louis staff, with an ERA of 2.25 this year and a stellar WHIP of 0.96. He's already dominated the Brewers twice this season, posting an ERA of 1.84 and a whip of 1.02 in those outings. Bush, meanwhile, should change his name to Bust. He's been a disappointment with the Brewers, and is having a worse year than anyone imagined possible. His ERA is 7.22 and his WHIP is 1.56. On offense, the Cards have a big advantage in what I consider to be the most important Major League stat. St. Louis has an on-base percentage of .368. That's the second best mark in the National League. Milwaukee is third worst at .317. It's a mismatch on offense and defense. I always like taking a team after a loss when their ace is on the mound. That intangible boost makes a very strong play even stronger. The Cards minus the price is the play. Thanks! GL! Scott.
|
|
|
|
|
Time 2008-05-11 20:05:00 |
|
|
I pick "
(513) NOR Hornets
".
My Second Round Game of the Year is a play on the Hornets, plus points. I had San Antone as a Main Event in game three and we were rewarded with a win and cover. But if not for the foul trouble on Tyson Chandler, I'm not so sure the Spurs would have won, let alone covered. New Orleans seemed to be taking control, leading 72-69 and with possession of the ball. But when Chandler got into foul trouble, the Spurs were able to drive the paint with Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. Once they got in the paint, they could shoot, kick it out, or deal to Tim Duncan, who came alive on the offensive end, ONLY after Chandler's fouls caught up to him. Before that, for over two-and-a-half games of action, Duncan was shut down like never before. When Chandler is on the floor, he and David West are absolute beasts on the defensive end. Chris Paul is able to stay in front of Tony Parker because of his ultra-quick foot-work. That style of defense keeps Parker from being able to penetrate the paint on a consistent basis. And, on the occasion he does, Parker is then left dumping off to a blanketed Tim Duncan. The Spurs end up settling for long jumpers and can't sustain for an entire four quarters, which is exactly what happened in games one and two...and into the third quarter of game three. The Lakers may be getting all of the headlines as the "best in the west", but don't sell New Oreans short. I believe they create way too many matchup problems for the Spurs. The Hornerts have bounced-back well following a double-digit loss this season, going 12-4 ATS the next time out. And, don't forget, before losing in game three, the Hornets had won four of the last five meetings with San Antone, including a 102-78 win on this floor in January. As far as I'm concerned the better team is getting points, and I believe the boys from the Big Easy are set to get an outright win in San Antone. I'm taking the points with the Hornets, my Second Round Game of the Year! Thanks! GL! Scott.
|
|
|
|
|
Time 2008-05-11 13:35:00 |
|
|
I pick "
(953) ATL Braves
".
I'm laying the price with the Braves on Sunday. Jair Jurrjens has been very effective for the Braves this year. His ERA is 2.84, and his WHIP is a very low 1.08. A look at his game-by-game breakdowns show that he has calmed down after a shaky start. Over the last five outings, those numbers are an even better 2.25 and 0.90! Zach Duke has struggled for the Pirates. His ERA is 4.61, and his WHIP is an unattractive 1.60. Duke also has trouble against the Braves. He has faced them twice this year and last, allowing 21 baserunners and six earned runs in just 11 1/3 innings. And, the southpaw has been horrible in day action over the last three seasons. Looks like a mismatch on the mound right there. On offense, another mismatch! The Braves lead the National League in hitting with a .285 mark entering the weekend. Pittsburgh is almost 30 points back at .256. One final note, Atlanta is much better than their seasonal record. The Braves are 1-10 in one-run games! That is a reflection of bad luck more than anything else. Atlanta is 17-6 the rest of the time. I believe the game today will fall into the latter category. The Braves minus the price is the play. Thanks! GL! Scott.
|
|
|
Click here for more
|
|
|
|
